Costs rose while the underlying condition data remained weak

GAO’s May 5, 2026 review says the Department of Energy’s environmental cleanup complex included about 4,300 operating facilities and more than $1.5 billion in identified repair needs as of June 2025. Fiscal 2026 maintenance spending exceeded $950 million—80% above fiscal 2020.

The accountability problem was not simply the size of the bill. GAO found some facility-condition scorecards inaccurate or unsupported and found incomplete corrective-action plans, weakening the records used to prioritize repairs.

DOE cleanup maintenance indicators
IndicatorGAO finding
Operating facilitiesAbout 4,300
Identified repair needsMore than $1.5B as of June 2025
FY 2026 maintenanceMore than $950M
Growth from FY 202080%
Sources: GAO-26-107957: Nuclear Waste Cleanup

Local plans did not fully reach headquarters

Officials at eight of 13 cleanup sites told GAO that DOE’s master asset plan did not include all of their infrastructure needs. That disconnect can cause headquarters and Congress to see a cleaner portfolio than site managers say they must maintain.

GAO also identified 19 cost-saving projects that sites said could yield about $120 million in savings, but DOE had not communicated them to Congress in the way GAO expected. Potential savings are estimates, not money already recovered.

What the records establish

The original contribution is the combined accountability picture: maintenance costs accelerated, documented repair needs exceeded $1.5 billion, and the scorecards used for prioritization were not consistently reliable. Congress therefore lacks a fully dependable basis for comparing risk and funding across sites.

The findings do not mean every facility is unsafe or that a radiological release occurred. GAO evaluated asset management and reporting; it did not issue a blanket engineering judgment on all 4,300 facilities.

Method and limits

GAO analyzed DOE records, site plans and scorecards and obtained information from cleanup sites. This newsroom checked the figures and recommendation status against the official product page and kept repair needs, annual maintenance spending and projected savings separate.

Facility counts and repair estimates can change as buildings close, new deficiencies are found or project scopes are refined. The $120 million figure describes potential savings from identified projects, not audited realized savings.

Sources and further reading

GAO-26-107957 and recommendations